Search
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Pedagogy
  • Podcast
  • Reviews
  • About
Close
Menu
Search
Close
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Pedagogy
  • Podcast
  • Reviews
  • About
Menu

ANCIENT JEW REVIEW

October 8, 2024

2023 SBL Review Forum for Yael Fisch's Written for Us

by Ancient Jew Review in Articles


“The Art of Comparison: Yael Fisch’s Written for Us: Paul’s Interpretation of Scripture and the History of Midrash”

by Christine Hayes

"After reading Fisch’s book I am convinced that Paul’s general hermeneutic should not be identified as a radicalization of Alexandrian allegory, or as allegory at all. And I can accept, based on Paul’s blend of the intertextual method featured in later rabbinic midrash with the terminology and content of allegory in Gal 4, that allegory and midrash are not always diametrically opposed, at least for Paul. Nevertheless, as Fisch herself recognizes and details, allegory and midrash differ in numerous ways. Moreover, they are not blended in the vast majority of works of ancient Jewish interpretation or in rabbinic literature, which suggests that their distinction as hermeneutical systems has heuristic value."

Midrash, Paul, and Difficulty

by Daniel Picus

"We tend to think about rabbinic interpretations, like midrash, arising from a difficulty in the text itself: smoothing out a piece of grit until, in the famous analogy, it becomes a pearl. What if, however, difficulties that arise from the juxtaposition of two texts are fertile ground for interpretation as well—and that interpretation is not meant to make them easier, but rather, harder?"

Pauline Christcentric Hermeneutics

by J. Ross Wagner

“To the extent that her readings of Rom 10, Gal 4, and 2 Cor 3 underplay the difference Christ makes for Pauline hermeneutics, Dr. Fisch’s book does not escape this trap. Studies that seek to build on her path-breaking work in the history of midrash will have to pay closer attention to this fundamental X-factor in Pauline hermeneutics. Nonetheless, she has blazed a broad trail for us with exceptional imagination, courage, and skill.”

Does Paul Give Preference to an Oral Nomos over the Written Nomos in Romans 10 for the sake of the Gentiles? A Response to Yael Fisch

by Isaac Soon

“All this to say that Paul’s emphasis in Romans 10 on speaking and subsequently hearing—orality—is not because it is relevant only to his gentile communities, but because it serves as an explanation for why part of Israel still not has yet believed; they cannot believe because they cannot “hear” the oral nomos speaking about Christ and righteousness by trust.”

Author Response: Review Forum Yael Fisch's Written for Us

by Yael Fisch

“After Echoes of Scripture, very few studies that stemmed from a NT context ever mention rabbinic literature anymore. My book works to revive and reframe this conversation, make room for early rabbinic texts in the study of Paul and make room for Paul in the study of ancient Midrash, without collapsing these texts into constricting and antiquated models of dependency and borrowing.”

TAGS: conference


  • Previous Post
    Midrash, Paul, and ...
  • Next Post
    “The Art of Comparison: ...
Index
Publications RSS
Contact
Name *
Thank you!

© 2025 Ancient Jew Review.